Comments on: ClimateGate, Copenhagen, and the only two questions that really matter

By: fortuna zaklady bukmacherskie

fortuna zaklady bukmacherskie — Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:28:25 +0000

Heyy dude, can i post articles to your blog ? Let me know if you are interested

By: John B

John B — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:17:03 +0000

The big problem for Greens is that the only non-carbon based energy source is nuclear. Building windmills and solar panels will accomplish almost nothing. They produce a lot of capital costs and maintainence costs but not much energy. However most Greens don’t want nuclear either. They must make a choice sooner or later because the world isn’t going to allow itself to use as little carbon based energy as they want unless the energy is replaced somehow.

By: bernice lipkin

bernice lipkin — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:58:43 +0000

The Copenhagen cohort was really getting me depressed in that they acted as if there was no doubt there’d be increasing global warming, so lets give our money to the rich people running the poor countries.. Then I came across your article promoting alternative energy. It cheered me up. Thank you.

By: Hghiplanesdrifter

Hghiplanesdrifter — Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:04:10 +0000

Seems like our elected officials need the big “wake-up” call…Hopefully in Nov next…(Before the polar ice caps melt…haha Algore)….Torches and pitchfork time…Necessary to show them they work for us, not the other way around…Any elected official on the side of the climate fraudsters, MUST be defeated and shown the door..

This from an earlier post….

We “KnowNothing Flatearthers” have known for a long time that the phony demagogues on the left will stop at nothing to lead the naive, the ill-informed, the un-informed and the mis-informed down this disastrous superhighway of deceit, whether it be single payer health care, cap/trade, or CAFE standards for cars.
If they really cared about greenhouse gases, they would shut their traps and include nuclear power and Natural Gas in the mix. But they don’t so, we “FlatEarthWarmers” must conclude it’s money and control they are after…With the latter being the main dish.. Drifter out…

By: Btok

Btok — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 04:43:46 +0000

This Copenhagen Summit has nothing to do with Climate Change or the Environment! It is about countries signing away their Sovereignty, so that they can be under the Communist Dictates of the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund that belongs to the Global Elitists!
The best deal for Canada is no deal and I hope Environment Minister Jim Prentice and Prime Minister Harper, take that attitude seriously as they will find should they come back after having signed away Canada’s Sovereignty, or our ability to have a quality lifestyle via draconic Carbon Taxes and Cap and Trade, in this “non -Global Warming Country”, that their political careers have ended!

If I were Jim Prentice,I would just tell the truth and state Canadian’s do not believe in the Carbon Emission Climate Change and on top of that it has been found – not in a small way that, the Scientific Data has been Severely Comprimised in many various actions, therefore until new true Scientific Data has been brought forward over time proven methods with honest Scientific Data brought forward!

Until that time Canada sees no way to put forward or provide funds or ratify or sign the Copenhagen Treaty. This deal is Null and Void!

Request that PM Harper DOES NOT sign the Copenhagen Treaty, thereby causing Canadians to lose their Sovereignty and Freedom, email the PM at: pm@pm.gc.ca

Sign the petition to protest the Inaccurate Science measurements that are being used to base the Copenhagen Treaty off of: http://www.gopetition.com/online/32485.html

I will say no more except you will be shocked by what you will hear in this main stream radio clip below!

http://2gb.com.au/index2.php?option=com_newsmanager&task=view&id=4998

Check out what Government is doing behind your back at : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU

By: RAFI

RAFI — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:02:09 +0000

Changing your name won’t matter…It what you say and the lame way you think that gets you in trouble…

By: Robert S. Siegel

Robert S. Siegel — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:21:18 +0000

See my response in today’s post; The nuclear option to climate change.

By: Lynn

Lynn — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:20:24 +0000

No problem with capitalism, but if BIG business is efficient and profitable, it shouldn’t need government support. Nevertheless, we have to deal with the system we have, so with my tax dollars I’d like policies supported that will help our economy grow in ways that will be advantageous to the environment. When we had cap and trade for Sulfur Dioxide, companies realized, “hey we’re losing a bunch of our product” and actually made more money. We need regulation because in capitalism there’s temptation to make the expedient decision, cash out and retire to an island or expect the taxpayers to bail you out if your business isn’t sustainable over time.

I’ve got to change my screen name, apparently we have trouble taking women seriously on this forum.

By: RAFI

RAFI — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:06:00 +0000

Oh “W” ..now we are connecting..Ahh, he’s long gone and no longer relevant …Bush derangement syndrome will get you nowhere…He was hated by the left and disliked by the right…Kinda in a political no man’s land…
But everything involving energy has drawbacks and costs. Just need to control them as well as we can…I used to think like you , that BIG BUSINESS was inherently bad. But with BIG comes efficiency, lower prices etc…Now I’m a fan of conscientious BIG B … Hard to get away from BB, esp in computers, cars, planes, etc…Got me???????…OK you’re, young …I’ll take it easy on you…But, Capitalism is the ONLY way out of the mess we’re in….Don’t doubt me…

By: Lynn

Lynn — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:28:44 +0000

Is it just possible that some misguided scientists falsified their evidence, but the rest of the evidence still points to global warming? Did you believe OJ was innocent just because some of the evidence may have been manufactured? I’m all for capitalism, but we seem to have many advocates of socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor.