Comments on: Fanaticism brought us hacked emails and ClimateGate

By: Robert S. Siegel

Robert S. Siegel — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:21:36 +0000

See my response in today’s post; The nuclear option to climate change.

By: RAFI

RAFI — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:21:08 +0000

I like that John….I’m doing it today…This has got to stop…And impeach Obamba…Isn’t being a commie dupe a misdemeanor???

By: RAFI

RAFI — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:18:14 +0000

Great Lynn, more proof of the collusion and cya…But wouldn’t you rather be warm then cold???

By: RAFI

RAFI — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:15:36 +0000

The MSM isn’t picking it up because they are in cahoots with the phony scientists… Both are part of the AXIS of Deception….Govt, academia, MSM, and science (GAMS)….Trust me on this…collusion is the order of the day..How do you think we got Obamba and the mess we’re in….

By: RAFI

RAFI — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:09:45 +0000

Right on Drifter, could you slap some sense into Lynn for me… She is totally OTL..(.out to lunch)…And doesn’t listen to reason…A total Drone …not worth the time… Wait ’till she get older, she’ll like it warm rather then cold…

By: HighPlanesDrifter

HighPlanesDrifter — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:18:45 +0000

HighPlanesDrifter12/8/2009

No matter what is discovered about the climate fraudsters, they will gleefully try to convince us that the darkness outside is really daylight…Really? Well this time fewer are buying it. .We “KnowNothings Flatearthers” (REALISTS) have known for a long time that phony demagogues on the left will stop at nothing to lead the naive, the ill-informed, the un-informed and the mis-informed down this disastrous superhighway of deceit, whether it be single payer health care, cap/trade, or CAFE standards for cars. If they really cared about greenhouse gasses, they would shut their traps and include nuclear power and NatGas on the menu. But they don’t so, we REALISTS must conclude it’s money and control they are after…With the latter being the main dish..HPD out….

By: Brett

Brett — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:43:56 +0000

It’s all about control. This UK proposal only adds more fuel to that fire.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/29/AR2008052903266.html

By: Robert S. Siegel

Robert S. Siegel — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:51:48 +0000

These are two excellent articles Lynn, thank you!

By: Lynn

Lynn — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:47:29 +0000

The London Times wrote an article: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936328.ece

And Slate had a nice discussion of the different sources of climate change data to put the problem in context.
http://www.slate.com/id/2237253/?from=rss

By: Lynn

Lynn — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:38:53 +0000

The mainstream media isn’t picking it up, I believe, because the story is likely to be a bit boring and data-driven. “We’ll apply an angorithm to mask the fact that some of the data don’t fit the model…” It doesn’t measure up when Tiger Woods was dating a couple of cocktail waitresses! The media largely don’t do nuance, and if ever there were a time for a nuanced reading of the facts, this is it. Some may be afraid they’ll do actual harm to what could still be a good cause.
Global warming supporters certainly have hurt their case, but proof of suppressed or manipulated data is not proof that global warming doesn’t exist, or that it is insignificant. If we all go out and buy hummers because of email-gate, we may be very sorry later.