Replace Income Gap/Inequality with better metrics

by Robert Sam Siegel on August 16, 2009


 Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Income inequality in the United States is at an all-time high, according to a report Friday in the Huffington Post. The study by University of California Berkeley Professor Emmanuel Saez shows that the gap is even higher now than during the great depression.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the gap is widening in part because of rising healthcare costs that employers are shifting to employees. Tom Freston, former president and CEO of Viacom says that there are a billion people at the bottom of the world’s income. I also found that the gap is the lowest in Beijing and highest in Hong Kong, and Singapore’s gap is larger than the U.S. and Britian.

Every report I found on income equality, and I found a lot, imply that a large gap is bad and a small gap is good. I am not so sure.

Should we really be worried about this thing called income gap or is this just a symptom of what many call wealth envy? I don’t care that some CEO earns 500 times what I earn unless I own stock in that company; in that case I want to make sure he is worth what he earns. That Hollywood stars and athletes make zillions more than I do is none of my concern. That Hollywood stars and athletes make zillions more than teachers, nurses, police, and fire fighters is an example of the silliness of our society.

We live in a screwed up world. My dog recieves a higher quality of food and health care than far too many children in this world. Before you scream at me for taking such great care of a dog and not giving that money to needy people, let me remind you that if everyone in my neighborhood did that the vet and the people at the pet supply store would join the list of the needy. Besides, if you have any kind of pet you can probably say the same thing about the quality of care your pet recieves. It’s not that we lavish so much on pets, it’s that too many children live in conditions where there is no where near enough quality healthcare and food for them. I for one, would like to fix that.

So why are we worrying about the income gap? Why do we care if other people make so much more than we do, or more than someone else does? Wealth is not a finite pie where if someone gets a giant slice you’re left with a small slice. Wealth is more like a seed, meaning you plant one and when it grows into a plant it provides a lot more seeds, each of which can then grow into a seed producing plants of its own. Wealth enables investment and commerce which means more wealth and opportunity for everybody. If the wealthy get wealthier they either spend or invest their money and both of those options benefit those of us that are not wealthy.

I would like to see measures that show how quality of life has improved for the other income levels correlated to the growth of wealth at the top end. Those measures need to include the power of our money to buy goods and services, the quality of shelter (air conditioning?), the gadgets and toys per household, vacations, house size, variety of foods eaten, and number of meals eaten out of the house, our health care, and any other measures that make 21st century life in the United States superior to anything anywhere else.

Focusing on the right measures will establish a realistic view of just how much the overall quality of our lives has accelerated in recent years. I think that people will realize that their hard work has paid off very nicely, so people will be inspired to seek more education, have more ambition, and develop self reliance; qualities that will help create more wealth at all levels while helping the poor pull themselves out of poverty.

Please help spread this blog!:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • RSS
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • email
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Print
  • Diigo
  • Twitter
  • Slashdot

{ 3 comments }

pronoiac August 16, 2009 at 3:05 pm

I agree with your thesis is that reading this metric in the context of the plebs rising up against the rich (Reign of Terror fashion) does not apply to you, me and most Americans. I argue that such a worry is very real for the top income earners of America, who are probably ready at any moment to flee the US, should we riot or loot their castles. Why else would G. W. Bush buy a plot of almost 100,000 acres in another country or does he consider US equity such a bad investment?
It is easy to debunk and hard to offer real critique. Any metric, isolated from all others and removed from a context, is rendered useless. For example, interpretation of infant mortality or maternal mortality rates in the US is fruitless, unless coupled with other metrics, say rate of c-sections, access to prenatal care…etc.
I want to see more metrics brought together and then interpreted within a variety of contexts, especially in light of how the working class can preserve their wealth. I long to stay part of the working class, and fear slipping into the downward spin the working poor are trapped. The owning class will always be able to protect themselves, if they only keep one eye open.

JBG724 August 17, 2009 at 1:01 pm

I’m not terribly concerned about the zillions that the pro sports stars and celebrities make. I think it’s a waste and probably a sign of problems w/in our society, but it’s ultimately a supply and demand issue. None of my money goes for Britney Spears CDs, so if that’s what teens want to shovel their money into, I guess that’s OK. I don’t buy tickets to watch spoiled millionnaires play baseball, either. Either way, I’m not fueling the demand and it doesn’t make me poorer.

There are a number of ways that the CEO issue is different, and I think it’s intellectually lazy to merely attribute concern to “wealth envy.”

I’ll let Jeb Bush make the first point:
“Large rewards for great results can still be attacked, but they’re very defensible. But if the rewards for CEOs and their teams become extraordinarily high with no link to performance – and shareholders are left holding the bag – then it undermines people’s confidence in capitalism itself.”

If shareholders had a say in executive compensation, I might agree with your point that you could determine if the CEO is worth what he earns. But with contract provisions that ratchet up pay based on income surveys among your peers, then the game is rigged. Under that model, all CEO salaries spiral up forever. Simple math.

It is also worth considering that GDP has risen over the last 30 years. What about real wages for workers? Where did the money go? Ummmm…lavish compensation at the top.

Boogster August 17, 2009 at 2:25 pm

Your assumptions are irrational for so many reasons one hardly knows where to start. For one thing, the wealth gap is the result of massive redistribution of wealth to the top 1% through tax and other governmental policy. Why wouldn’t that concern every citizen?

For another, to assume anyone, including a highly paid athlete or movie star, isn’t the beneficiary of the overall collective social fabric made possible in part by contributions of all citizens is absurd.

The top hedge fund manager last year “earned” $2.5 billion, down from over $3 billion the year before. What is a reasonable tax rate for this person? Is it possible for anyone to “earn” $2.5 billion? If you tax him at 90%, he takes home $250 million.

I’m in the top 5%, and I would never whine about my taxes if all I got to take home was $250 million. I’d be happy to be living in such a great country that allowed such windfalls, amounting to “grace” by any reasonable analysis, and not bitching about supporting the system that made it possible.

For starters…

Previous post:

Next post: